Learning Theology with the Church Fathers

LTCF.pngHall, Christopher A.

Learning Theology with the Church Fathers

Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002. Pp. 308. Paper. $18.00.

Amazon | CBD | Eisenbrauns

.

.
.

With thanks to Adrianna Wright of IVP for this review copy!

Learning Theology with the Church Fathers (hereafter LTCF) is Christopher Hall’s follow-up to his acclaimed Reading Scripture with the Church Fathers (hereafter RSCF).  His goal with LTCF is much the same as it was with RSCF, to introduce interested readers to patristic theology.  In Hall’s own words this “is simply a primer intended for beginners” [p. 12]  The ‘beginner’ ranges from the rusty pastor to the seminary student to the motivated layman with a desire to understand the great theological traditions of the Christian faith.

There is a bit of a difference in the format from the last volume to this one; in RSCF Hall focused his attention on the eight “great doctors of the Church” (four from the East and four from the West) and the two major locales connected with patristic exegesis (i.e., Alexandria & Antioch).  In this volume Hall focuses on the “central theological loci”: Christology, Theology proper (i.e., the Trinity), Eschatology, and Ecclesiology by giving readings from prominent fathers on each subject.

In the second chapter “Christ the Son, Begotten and Not Made” Hall focuses mainly on Athanasius and Arius, although in my opinion he doesn’t give an adequate account of the so-called Arian controversy.  Hall tends to focus on the metaphysical aspect of the debate (i.e., the deity of Christ) without noting the soteriological factors that caused the questions in the first place, i.e., how can a creature save? (Athanasius) or how can the Creator assume humanity and die? (Arius).

When turning to the Trinity Hall relates a number of questions quite common among believers both old and new about the relevance of the Trinity in our lives.  His answer is that for the fathers, the doctrine of the Trinity was a faithful witness to the teaching of Jesus and the apostles.  Hall’s theologians of choice for discussing this doctrine were Gregory of Nazianzus and Augustine, and while he couldn’t have chosen two better theologians from the East and West to focus on, the treatment feels incomplete.  It would have been wonderful to see Hilary of Poitiers included as well as some of the Ante-Nicene fathers like Novatian.

When turning to “Sin, Grace, and the Human Condition” Hall looks at Irenaeus (albeit too briefly in my estimation) and the debate that raged between Augustine and Pelagius.  Pelagius appears to be fairly represented by Hall in his acknowledging that:

Pelagius, then, cannot be accused of denying God’s role in helping us to obey, but he largely limits this helping role to those innate abilities God created in human nature with the creation of Adam and Eve. The choice remains for each human being as to whether he or she will choose to exercise these divinely given abilities in obedience to God and God’s commandments. [p. 135]

So Hall doesn’t reproduce the old canard that Pelagius taught that people could save themselves or work for their salvation, although he does later critique Pelagius with clear Augustinian sympathies (as the vast majority of the Church has since the time of Augustine).

All in all Hall’s treatments of the subjects covered in LTCF are competent.  His writing is clear and there’s nothing major to gripe with in terms of his understanding or presentation of these great doctrines of orthodoxy.  My major criticism is that he has limited himself too much in terms of the witnesses he chooses to address each topic.  One glaring example is that in the chapter on the Holy Spirit (ch. 5) Hall focuses solely on Basil the Great.  There’s no doubt that Basil’s On the Holy Spirit stands as a giant among midgets in terms of fourth century pneumatological writing, but this chapter was ripe for interaction with Athanasius’ Letters to Serapion on the Holy Spirit.  Another unfortunate omission was reference Origen on the eternal generation of the Son in chapters two and three, but this is for obvious reasons (i.e., Origen isn’t technically considered a ‘church father’ see p. 21).

The book is rounded out with thirty pages of end notes (God, when will they stop using these?!!), a three-page subject index, and a one-page scripture index.  As an introduction LTCF gets the job done but suffers from what in my opinion is too narrow a focus on certain fathers.  I would have rather seen a broader representation of writers and a more general interaction with this larger body of works.  I give this work three stars.3.0 out of 5 stars

B”H

About these ads

8 thoughts on “Learning Theology with the Church Fathers

  1. Nick, I did find this book useful as an introduction to the church fathers. I never had read any of their works, other than whatever quotes I have read in other books.

    I would say that as an introductory to the church fathers it is really good. He did stir up a curiosity to read more, so in that sense it was great. Also I did not think that he was boring, so that helped.

  2. Robert: I agree, my major complaint is that I wish there were more! I think that Hall writes well and he does a good job of introducing people to the issues, but he could introduce them to a few more people and devote less time to each of them.

  3. well, if you don;t want it, I’ll have it…!;) I need to get both of these, been eying them. I’ve put in for review copies from IVP but still no response to date. Ah well. Nothing from Crossway either.

  4. Nick, you are a fairly advance reader when it comes to the Church Fathers, so I just wanted to point out that it is a great introduction and he will do a good job of getting you very interested into reading more about them.

    He certainly inspired me to want to read more. He has a third one coming out on this series but I don’t know when.

  5. Brian: Trust me, I want it! It’s a good book, but it seems incomplete, that’s all. Maybe the P.O. Box is a problem.

    Robert: I hear ya, and trust me, I’m not that advanced. I still consider myself a beginner when it comes to patristics. I thought that the third volume was out but I had it confused with this book.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s