How to Choose a Translation for All Its Worth

translations.jpgFee, Gordon D. and Mark L. Strauss.

How to Choose a Translation for All Its Worth: A Guide to Understanding and Using Bible Versions

Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2007. Pp. 170. Paper. $12.99.

Westminster Bookstore | Amazon | Eisenbrauns

.

.

With thanks to Andrew Rogers at Zondervan for this book!

This book wasn’t actually given to me for review but I enjoyed it so much that I thought I should at least say a few words.  For starters, translation issues aren’t something I generally get riled up over.  I’ve not engaged in the whole TNIV/ESV debate and I rarely, if ever, point out grievous translational errors (although I do point out some, but not nearly all that I come across), and when it’s all said and done translation theory isn’t an interest of mine.  So you can imagine how shocked I was that I enjoyed this book as much as I did.

One of the reasons that I liked it so much is because Fee and Strauss taught me as much about my native tongue as they did about Hebrew and Greek.  I speak fluent English but I take it for granted.  I don’t give much thought to the way that English works but in reading through this book I started to really appreciate why it’s important to give thought to these matters.  It’s fairly obvious that not all languages function the same, but if one doesn’t know how their language functions then it will be near impossible to translate another language into their native tongue.  Fee and Strauss write well, and they write clearly.  Fee says in the preface that he had his wife proof the book to make sure it was understandable for a lay audience.  All scholars should have wives like this!  But this is really what the book is about: clear communication!

Fee and Strauss argue for functional equivalence over formal equivalence and they do so persuasively.  They point out again and again how all translation is interpretation and that there’s no such thing as a one-to-one correspondence between languages.  This wasn’t anything new to me in terms of information but they showed repeatedly how there really is no such thing as a “literal” translation, and those that purport to be “literal” end up making less sense than those that don’t.  Words have many meanings and their varying contexts determine which meaning is supposed in any given instance.  This is why concordant versions of the Bible fail so miserably and sound so unnatural.  But if there’s one thing that this book has drilled into me it’s that the primary goal of translation should be to convey the meaning of the source language into the target language as opposed to the form.

It’s no secret that I’ve spent most of my Christian life reading the KJV and that’s given me a certain advantage when it came to reading other predominantly formal equivalent translations (I say predominantly because all translations inevitably mix formal and functional equivalency).  Being well versed in the King’s English (i.e., Biblish) made reading some of the more awkward things in the NASB or ESV tolerable because in all honesty, they weren’t any more awkward than a lot of what I was used to from the KJV.  But in the past couple of years I’ve really enjoyed the NLT which I presently use for devotional reading.  The strength of the NLT(se) lies in its ability to clearly communicate the message contained in the Hebrew and Greek without necessarily conforming to the form.  And that’s really the basic argument of the book.  The translation that people can understand is the one that is to be preferred.  They acknowledge that different translations are aimed at different audiences and this should be taken into account.  The NCV or CEV is geared more toward someone with a lower reading level or whose first language is not English, while the NLT(se) is geared more toward typical readers of English.

It’s quite clear that Fee and Strauss prefer the TNIV for its mediating position between formal and functional and they see it as a great translation from which to study, but this is to be expected since they helped to produce it!  And since I just got a TNIV time will tell how much I like it, but one thing’s for sure, as I work through the TNIV I’ll do so with this book close at hand.  I highly recommend this work to anyone interested in Bible translations.  Fee and Strauss do well to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the various translation theories and methods as well as a host of English translations.  There are tons of examples to support all the points made, a glossary of key terms in the back, and as I said at the beginning of this review, Fee and Strauss write clearly and argue persuasively.  I think the only thing I took issue with was the assumption of a Johannine community behind the Gospel of John in chapter 6 (p. 91).  But other than that this one is well worth your time.

B”H

9 thoughts on “How to Choose a Translation for All Its Worth

  1. I’ve linked to this book on my most recent blog post about choosing Bible translations. I’m currently finishing up a class that I took under Dr. Stuart. What a great man with the heart of a pastor!

    However, my post has to do with the problem of choosing a good Bible translation. How do you choose a good Bible translation when you don’t have a translation in your language? There needs to be an end to English translation projects until we’ve put a dent in the more than 2200 languages that don’t have a single verse translated. Of the nearly 7,000 languages in the world only 438 have the whole Bible translated from the original languages. That should not be!

    Please read and let me know your thoughts:

    http://churchethos.com/2009/07/01/the-problem-of-choosing-a-good-bible-translation/

  2. TC: Thanks, and since it’s the only one I got I suppose it’s the one I’ll turn to most often as well! ;-)

    Wayne: And I’m sure that having your name mentioned in the preface hasn’t influenced your opinion at all! :-P (Just kidding, I’m sure you helped to make it as good as it is).

    Joe: I agree. I pretty much feel that way about everything from Fee that I’ve read.

    Nathan: There’s no doubt that we need the Bible translated into as many languages as possible. I thank God that there’s a number of people working to accomplish this very thing. That being said, I don’t think we need to stop making more English translations until the other goal is reached. I think we can work towards both goals at the same time. I’ll check your post out soon.

    Andrew: Thanks!

  3. Maybe those people who speak those 2200 other languages should just learn English, Spanish, Cantonese, or one of the other languages that have Bible written in them. Besides I hear outside the US everyone speaks multiple languages anyways so maybe those people who speak one of the 2200 languages without a Bible also speak a language that does have a Bible.

    Just saying… ; )

    Nick:

    Glad you enjoyed the book. Be careful though, I don’t want any rivals for biggest Gordon Fee fan on the internet! Stick with Hurtado!

    Bryan L

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s