The New Testament in Antiquity: A Survey of the New Testament within Its Cultural Contexts

NTA.jpgBurge, Gary M., Lynn H. Cohick, and Gene L. Green

The New Testament in Antiquity: A Survey of the New Testament Within Its Cultural Contexts

Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2009. Pp. 479. Hardcover. $49.99.

Amazon | Eisenbrauns | Dove Booksellers

.

With thanks to Andrew Rogers from Zondervan for this review copy!

Introduction

To put it bluntly, New Testament introductions and surveys are a dime a dozen and have been for quite some time.  One wonders what might persuade a publisher who already publishes a rather popular and useful NT intro in Carson & Moo’s volume to put another one out just a few years later.  What sets this particular intro/survey apart from the rest and what makes it worth our time, attention, and hard earned money?  It’s no secret that for the past few years Zondervan has been publishing some of the most exquisite books in terms of aesthetic appeal.  My introduction to this publishing revolution came in 2006 when I first got a copy of the Archaeological Study Bible.  I thought to myself, “Wow!  Zondervan went all out in the production of this one!”  Then last year I was fortunate enough to receive a review copy of Mark Strauss’ Four Portraits, One Jesus courtesy of Chris Fann at Zondervan.  My amazement with the visual quality of that volume was just as high.  So by the time I got The New Testament in Antiquity (hereafter NTA) it was no great shock that it would be of great aesthetic quality.  This volume is beautiful throughout; from the tastefully reserved black hardcover to the myriads of photographs, maps, and charts that line its pages.  Zondervan has done it again!

But the old adage remains true; you can’t judge a book by its cover.  So what about the overall quality of NTA?  How useful a survey/introduction is it?  I think that for its intended audience (i.e., undergraduates) it’s a very useful resource.  We need to keep the authors’ four goals in mind when flipping through this volume.  They wanted a text that was: academic, accessible, contextual, and confessional.  I submit that they’ve succeeded on all counts but I’ll grant that it’s this last goal that will throw many readers.  The authors say:

[W]e wanted a volume that is responsive to the confessional commitments of the evangelical tradition. Too often academic treatments of the New Testaments view faith commitments as passé. We wanted a scholarly text that treated the pages of the New Testament as Scripture, which has spoken to the church through the centuries. (p. 9)

I think it’s rather refreshing to see this kind of honesty from the beginning, and it’s also commendable that the authors haven’t thought it necessary to check their faith at the door.  They’re quite content to view the NT as divinely inspired Scripture recognizing that “God is at work in and through th[o]se chapters to bring life and transformation to all who seek him there.” (p. 16)

Contents

The book contains 27 chapters with chapter 1 serving as an introduction to the volume itself, describing its various features, the necessity to study the ancient cultural backgrounds and contexts of the NT, etc.  Chapters 2-7 give all of that great background information that one expects to find in such a survey, i.e., a brief history of the periods leading up to the NT, the worlds of Jesus and Paul, ancient non-Biblical sources for the life of Jesus, and some space in chapter 5 is devoted to discussing literary and historical criticism of the Gospels as well as the Synoptic problem and the authenticity of the Gospels.  This section is littered with valuable information to aid the budding scholar.

Chapters 8-26 address the NT books themselves and of course cover issues of genre, date and authorship, as well as pointing out significant features of each book.  Each chapter gives an outline of the book(s) discussed and they highlight the theological arguments of each book as well.  Certain books are broken down according to large pericopes, e.g., Luke is addressed according to the following scheme:

  • The Infancy Narrative (2:5 — 2:52)
  • The Beginnings: John and Jesus (3:1 —  4:13)
  • The Galilean Ministry (4:14 — 9:50)
  • The Journey to Jerusalem (9:51 — 19:44)
  • Jerusalem Ministry (19:45 — 21:38)
  • The Crucifixion, Resurrection, and Ascension of Jesus (22:1 — 24:53)

The authors are careful to provide plenty of cultural and contextual information to help the reader shake off the effects of their modern mindset, but there’s never so much information that you feel overloaded or burdened.  Reference is made to honor/shame cultures, client/patron relationships, collectivist societies, etc.  When the subtitle says “A Survey of the New Testament within Its Cultural Contexts” it means it.  From Jewish law and custom to Greco-Roman excesses, this survey covers it all.

Chapter 27 is on the preservation and communication of the NT.  This chapter covers textual criticism, the formation of the NT canon, and finally translation, both past and present.

Features

The features such as the photographs, maps, charts, and especially sidebars are really the best thing about NTA.  The photos are beautiful, plain and simple.  They’re all relevant to whatever topic is under discussion and they help those who learn better visually to really grab a hold of the material.  The charts are quite helpful as well, and maps, well, they’re maps, nothing overly spectacular about those.  But the sidebars are awesome.  These are exactly the kind of pithy little summaries and treatments of subjects that will really stick with a reader.  I can only speak for myself, but when I study or listen to someone teaching I have a tendency to summarize things in my head as I go along.  This way I can retain the information easily without getting lost in all the details.  That’s how I’d describe these sidebars.  I’d also mention the end of chapter bibliographies.  These all contain an introductory and advanced list of material that will aid the student in further study.

Errata

Dr. Rod Decker pointed out a while back that on p. 16 of NTA there is an image labeled P52 that is not in fact P52.  I later discovered that it was P.Oxy. 52.  Interestingly enough, there is a photo of P52 on p. 442 that is correctly labeled.  Jesse Hillman of Zondervan informed me that this error will be corrected in subsequent editions.  And I was also informed by Andrew Rogers before receiving my review copy that the back cover misspelled Scot McKnight’s last name and that this was being corrected before NTA hit the shelves for retail, so while my copy contains this misprint yours probably will not.

Complaints

I don’t have many complaints for this volume at all.  One thing I would have liked to have seen would be Luke-Acts treated together rather than separately.  I think it would have also been helpful to structure the chapters according to the book outlines that they provide.  I would normally complain about the use of chapter end notes but there aren’t a lot of notes at all, and the ones that are there are mainly bibliographic, which fits in nicely by placing them after the end of chapter bibliographies.

Recommendation

I’d recommend this volume to any undergrad or motivated layman looking for a good survey/intro to the NT.  I think it serves this audience well.  The grad or post-grad student would largely be rehearsing things that they already know and in many places disagreeing with the authors’ presentations (e.g., on the issues of date and authorship).  I think Pat McCullough’s suggestion of using NTA in conjunction with another (less conservative?) survey is a good one.  It never hurts to see what “the other side” is saying about the NT as well.

B”H

11 thoughts on “The New Testament in Antiquity: A Survey of the New Testament within Its Cultural Contexts

  1. Just want to say thanks for the review. I have An Introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation by David A. deSilva on my list. I think if I were to get two, this would be my next choice.

    If you or anyone has any comparisons to these two and if they’d complement each other, let me know.
    Jeff

  2. adhunt: I’ve not seen all the intros that are out there but anything that Raymond Brown touched is as good as gold in my opinion.

    Andrew: Well Pat recommended Bart Ehrman’s intro alongside of this one in his review, but I’d probably suggest (in agreement with adhunt above) Raymond Brown’s. Or since this one is really aimed at undergrads then Delbert Burkett’s An Introduction to the New Testament and the Origins of Christianity (CUP, 2002) would probably offer a nice contrast.

  3. Thanks for pointing me to your review. I do like how you have organized it with clear headers–and I think we have made many of the same points! You just need to put a little bit of padding on the image of the book, that’s all. ;-)

  4. Brandon: I compose my posts in IE7 so it looks fine to me, but I’d imagine that you’re viewing it in Firefox which explains why it appears that there’s no padding. I don’t underatand why there’s a discrepancy between the two browsers but it’s there nonetheless. I’ve not been able to jump on the Firefox bandwagon just yet. ;-)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s