The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship

HT.jpgLetham, Robert.

The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship

Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 2004. Pp. xv + 551. Paper. $24.99.

Westminster Bookstore | Amazon | CBD



I picked this book up for some research that I was doing on the doctrine of the Trinity for a book project that I was working on (excerpts available here). Having never heard of Robert Letham I was greatly surprised with his work because this ended up being the best book on the subject I have ever read! Dr. Letham says in the preface to this volume, “Sadly, since the time of Calvin, little of significance has been contributed to the development of Trinitarian doctrine by conservative Reformed theologians.” (p. ix) Such is no longer the case as this work is nothing less than significant to the serious student of theology.

He notes in his introduction the potential problems for Trinitarians such as the necessary use of extra-biblical language due to the debates that occurred in the early Church, as well as the Eastern Church’s tendency towards subordinationism and the Western Church’s bent towards modalism (p. 1-4). Letham is both fair and accurate in his portrayal of the facts, not showing favoritism or bias. It was refreshing to see such an in-depth exploration of the Eastern position on the Trinity.

From the introduction Letham begins by laying the foundation for Trinity in Scripture with its Old Testament background. He begins with God as Creator and points out a pattern of creation whereas everything was created in 2 groups of 3 days each. He then moves onto the Angel of the Lord and the theophanies in the Old Testament while weaving these themes into Israel’s monotheism and showing a distinction in God. A treatment on the Father as God and the Spirit of God follow and the first chapter is concluded with some facts on the Word/Wisdom of God and the expectations of the coming Messiah. The first chapter alone is worth the price of the book.

Time and space prohibit me from writing as much as I would like to in reference to this work, but I will say this. Letham covers nearly every theologian who has ever written anything significant concerning the Trinity from the 1st century with Paul to the modern era with T. F. Torrance covering everyone from the Cappadocians to Calvin in between. No stone was left unturned and as I stated above, he presented the facts fairly and accurately (although as a Calvinist he did show what seemed to me to be a greater appreciation for Calvin than any other theologian addressed). Letham has an uncanny ability to represent a man’s position as it actually stands and not as Letham wished it would have, while noting the strengths and weaknesses of said position. This is the tone of the work throughout.

His treatments on John of Damascus and the perichoretic relationship that exists within the Trinity is masterful, simply the best I have read to date! To my great surprise Letham spent quite a bit of time on some contemporary Eastern theologians (Sergius Bulgakov, Vladimir Lossky, and Dumitru Staniloae) documenting their positions on “Eastern Love Mysticism” saying that:

These thinkers begin their discussion of the Trinity from an analysis of personhood. They understand persons, not as individual entities, but in communion with others. From this, they see the Trinity as a communion of love. (p. 323-4)

A very enlightening chapter indeed as I had previously been ignorant of these theologians or their contributions to an idea that Augustine had broken ground on in the 4th century.

While I would love to give a summary of each chapter that is impossible as there is so much that could be said. But I will close with these remarks. Letham doesn’t simply treat the Trinity as orthodox theology or a necessary doctrine (of course he recognizes that it is these things)—but rather he treats the Trinity as it truly is: GOD! This sets the scene for his chapter on the Trinity in worship and prayer. He recognizes that in lieu of our postmodern society the Trinity has largely been lost in our praise and worship of God. He documents everything from Christian hymns to the Charismatic special focus on the Holy Spirit in support of this position.

Arguing from the base that we cannot begin with the essence of God as has classically been done in the West since Augustine or any one person of God (i.e. the Father) as has been classically done in the East since the Cappadocians (Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory of Nazianzus) Letham suggests that we return to all three persons of God as our proper object or worship and prayer. He says:

The church’s worship is grounded in who God is and what he has done. The Father has sent the Son ‘for us and our salvation’…In turn, the Father together with the Son has sent the Holy Spirit to indwell the church…Not only is our salvation a work of God, not only is it Trinitarian through and through, but it is initiated by the Father, accomplished by the Son, and applied by the Holy Spirit. (p. 413)

I leave the reader with one caveat: if you have not taken the time to study who and what God is in depth, then this might not be the book to start with. This book, as wonderful as it is, and even with its glossary of terms (497-503), assumes some familiarity with the doctrine of the Trinity. I would suggest beginning with something more basic such as Gerald O’Collins’ The Tripersonal God: Understanding and Interpreting the Trinity, supplemented with readings of the Ante-Nicene, Nicene, and Post-Nicene Fathers before picking this volume up. But if you are acquainted with the doctrine of the Trinity and have a desire to know even more about it, then this is the book for you. Whatever the price, buy it! It’s well worth it! I’d suggest it for the footnotes and bibliography alone; it’s that good!



13 thoughts on “The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship

  1. Pingback: just after sunrise
  2. Richard: De Trinitate is great, and certainly something that I think every trinitarian would do well to read (Augustine also has quite a bit to say about the Trinity in City of God). My main problem with Augustine’s trinitarianism is the lover-beloved-love analogy that he employed. I think that his critics are right to point out that viewing the Holy Spirit as the “bond of love” between the Father (Lover) and the Son (Beloved) depersonalizes the Spirit.

    And many people have also charged Augustine with treating the being/essence of God as a fourth entity somewhat separate from the persons of the Trinity, but in my opinion Augustine took great pains to safeguard against such a concept. I think that Aquinas is more properly charged with doing that.

    In any event, when you get around to reading him I’d love to hear some of your thoughts.

  3. Nick: Regarding Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship, I read through chapter one over the weekend.


    I have never had to refer to the dictionary so often in a book’s introduction as I did for this one.

  4. Stan: Great, I’m glad you’re enjoying (and being challenged by) it! In case you haven’t come across it, there’s a glossary of terms in the back of the book. That should save you from having to grab a dictionary.

  5. Jason: It’s my favorite book on the subject. I recommend it to anyone who will listen. BTW, this is an old review that I reformatted; that’s why it popped up in your feed.

  6. I read Letham’s book on your recommendation, and it was brilliant. My understanding was significantly sharpened as a result, as was my appreciation and worship of the Trinity. Thanks for the recommend!

  7. Adam: My pleasure! I’m glad to hear that you’ve found the book useful. It’s one that I return to again and again, and always with great profit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s