
The Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible: Revised, Full-Color ed. (5 volumes)
.
.
With thanks to Jesse Hillman at Zondervan for this review copy!
The Zondervan Encyclopedia of the Bible (hereafter ZEB) is a revision of the Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible (hereafter ZPEB) published in 1975 which was a work inspired by the 1963 Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary. The ZPEB served students, pastors, and scholars well for over thirty years, but as with everything, discoveries are made, knowledge increases, and concerns shift. Under the revising editorship of Moisés Silva the ZEB has been produced to address these shifting concerns while reflecting the growth in knowledge over the past thirty-plus years. According to the introduction “hundreds of brief new articles have been added… some twenty new in-depth articles have been commissioned… [v]arious existing articles have been totally rewritten… [and] [s]pecial effort has been expended to make bibliographical references more current.” (1.v) Silva claims responsibility for the revisions to all articles between the original edition and this one. Where a new name appears attached to an old article the responsibility for the differences is that of the new author.
Aesthetically this set is exquisite, which is commonplace for Zondervan publications these days. The five hardcover volumes all share the same cover art while varying in the background color of the title. They’re encased in an attractive slipcase that’s quite durable. This is ideal for users who would like to keep the set on their desk or perhaps a side-table near where they read. I’ve opted to remove the volumes and house them in my bookcase containing my various other dictionaries and encyclopedias and at present they’re the center of attention. Once each volume is opened the reader is treated to a plethora of beautiful high-resolution, full-color photographs, charts, and maps. I’m hard-pressed to think of a visual image that could have been included in this set that wasn’t. There are more than a few really nice aerial shots of various cities (e.g., Khirbet Qana [1.513] or Jerusalem [3.166]), hundreds of photos of ancient artifacts (e.g., an altar dedicated to Zeus found in Hierapolis [5.244] or a cuneiform tablet containing the Epic of Atrahasis [2.591]), dozens of maps of every location listed in the Bible, and hundreds of pictures of various buildings, plants, ruins, ancient artwork, etc. Pretty much anything you can think of can be found within the pages of these five volumes.
The articles (over 7,500 in all) were produced by more than 250 contributors from around the world. They’re written from a conservative evangelical point of view but fairly represent alternative views when describing and interacting with them (at least so far as I have read). They vary in length from a few sentences to monograph length treatments of certain subjects, e.g., Donald Guthrie’s A Shorter Life of Christ (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1970) was originally the entry for “Jesus Christ” in the ZPEB and has been updated by Silva for ZEB (3.567-664). The longer articles begin with outlines and are concluded with bibliographies of works recommended for further study. The material used throughout the article is generally referenced within the article itself. A strong emphasis has been placed on works from 1990-2007 while “works published in 2008 have been added less systematically.” (1.v) Due to space limitations full bibliographic information is not provided and the reader is left with the title and year of publication. The cross-referencing system is pretty standard; when a reference is made to a topic that has an entry somewhere else in the encyclopedia it’s printed in small caps to alert the reader to this fact.
Needless to say with over 7,500 articles I haven’t even skimmed the surface of all that this set has to offer, and I doubt that I’ll ever work through them all, but that’s the nature of reference material: you reference it when you need to. Of the more substantial articles that I’ve read so far on “Jesus Christ” (3.567-664); “Spiritual Gifts” (5.596-600); “Monotheism” (4.307-8); “Adam” (1.60-3); “Christology” (1.834-8); “Biblical Criticism” (1.607-22); and “Johannine Theology” (3.708-24) I can say that I have mixed feelings. For the most part they’re quite good. Donald Guthrie’s two entries on “Jesus Christ” and “Johannine Theology” are wonderful from beginning to end. They’re both in-depth and scholarly while being easy to read and not overly technical. The same can be said for Grant Osborne on “Biblical Criticism.” The manner in which he’s able to accurately explain positions that he personally disagrees with is commendable. Ralph Alan Cole on “Spiritual Gifts” seems somewhat sparse and doesn’t really do Paul justice, and his entry on “Christology” focuses on titles alone, not showing any familiarity with what’s been going on in the field over the past twenty years. Paul King Jewett on “Monotheism” is dated both in terms of the content of the article and the bibliography following it, e.g., there’s no reference to Hayman, Hurtado, Horbury, Bauckham, Fredriksen or anyone who has written anything significant on the subject in the past twenty to thirty years. This reflects a feature that I’m not overly enthusiastic about; Silva explains:
[T]he revising editor, out of respect for the integrity of individual contributions, has retained many comments and opinions that were more persuasive thirty years ago than they are today. As a result, certain articles may come across as somewhat dated in their concerns or in their manner of expression, but most users of the encyclopedia will appreciate hearing the authentic voice of the contributors. (1.vi)
Unfortunately, warning the reader in advance doesn’t make up for dated entries, and if the reader were so inclined they could consult the original edition to hear the authentic voice of a contributor thirty years ago. I also have an aesthetic gripe, although I’ll admit it’s a small one and something that most readers wouldn’t care about at all, but there are many times when the photographs extend into the outer margins of the pages. It throws off the symmetry of the page and to my eye is somewhat distracting. I realize that I’m nitpicking, but in a set as well produced as this one flaws are going to be difficult to find, and that’s a good thing! From what I’ve seen of the ZEB so far I’m confident that it will aid any student, pastor, or scholar (especially those looking for an alternative view then they’d get, in say, the Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary) in their studies, sermon preparation, or research. Whether you’re looking for an introduction to a specific book of the Bible, a brief synopsis of a certain character found within the Bible, background information on places or events, or discussions of matters pertaining to Biblical interpretation or theology, the ZEB has it all. I look forward to using this set with great profit for years to come.
B”H

so if one has the original shoud he or she fork over the $200 for the new set?
By: Brian on October 31, 2009
at 6:10 pm
Brian: I don’t have the original so I can’t say for sure, but my gut says yes, it’s worth it. There’s plenty of new material and a lot of the old stuff has been updated. It’s unfortunate, to my mind, that Silva has chosen to leave some stuff in there that’s dated, but I can’t imagine that he’s left so much that it wouldn’t be profitable to own the new set. That said, it’s an expensive set so one might like to get variety of opinions before committing to purchasing it, preferable by people who have used both sets.
By: Nick Norelli on October 31, 2009
at 6:23 pm
I realize the answer is apparent but if one was faced with purchasing either this series or the IVP Bible Dictionaries for an Evangelical perspective where would you look?
By: adhunt on November 1, 2009
at 5:37 pm
Anthony: Ooh, tough one. My gut says go with the IVP black dictionaries because of how in-depth almost every article is. The only drawback I see to that set over this one is that most of the NT volumes are just about due for an update whereas this one has just been updated. I’d say that both sets have different functions though. I’ll use the ZEB when I’m looking for a quick answer to a question or a refresher on something I haven’t studied in a while, while I’d probably go to the IVP volumes for a more sustained treatment of certain issues. Keep in mind also that the IVP dictionaries are more focused because of the way they’re set up (i.e., each volume is dedicated specifically to a section of biblical material), while the ZEB is more exhaustive in terms of the topics covered.
By: Nick Norelli on November 1, 2009
at 7:19 pm
Anthony: Wait, I just noticed that you were asking about an evangelical perspective. In that case then definitely ZEB. The contributors to the IVP black dictionaries are all good evangelicals, and there’s some overlap between the two sets in their contributors, but you’ll find more of the standard historico-grammatical hermeneutic (i.e., the standard evangelical hermeneutic) in the ZEB whereas the IVP dictionaries’ contributors follow a more historical-critical approach.
By: Nick Norelli on November 1, 2009
at 7:21 pm
So what you’re saying is that the ZEB is conservative evangelical right?
I’ve got the Anchor so it seems like ZEB would be an opposite extreme?
By: adhunt on November 1, 2009
at 9:02 pm
Anthony: Yes, as I said of the articles in the review: “They’re written from a conservative evangelical point of view but fairly represent alternative views when describing and interacting with them (at least so far as I have read).”
By: Nick Norelli on November 1, 2009
at 9:45 pm
Right now, you can buy this brand new set (ZEB)for only $119.99 on CBD (http://www.christianbook.com/zondervan-encyclopedia-bible-5-volumes-revised/9780310241362/pd/241362). CBD had been selling for $149.99. Due to Thanksgiving, it lowers the price to $119.99. I believe CBD would change this price back to $149.99 after Thanksgiving. Besides, a representative said CBD would change the price back to $179.99 approx. in Jan, 2010. Regarding ZPEB, CBD is trying to get rid of them by selling only $39.99. Yet, if you call CBD to purchase, it is only $34.99. Two weeks ago, I purchased ZPEB for $34.99. Indeed, it was really hard for me to decide which one to buy. It was such a deal to get ZPEB. On Thanksgiving, I found that CBD offered extra 10% discount on website purchase. Therefore, I ended up buying ZEB for $108 only which is less than 38.57% of original price. What a deal!
Now, I am thinking whether I should keep ZPEB so that I can sometimes refer to it to hear the authentic voice of the contributors. Nick, do you think I should refund it or keep it?
By: Yip on November 28, 2009
at 2:51 pm
Yip: I’ve been told by people who own the original set that if I have the new one then I shouldn’t bother with the old one. I’ve considered getting ZPEB at the price CBD has it for, but I can’t justify the cost right now. If you need the money then go for the refund, but if you can afford both sets then it can’t hurt to have them.
By: Nick Norelli on November 28, 2009
at 2:56 pm
Nick: Do you mean the people who own both sets think that since they had bought the new sets, they would not bother the old set anymore? Have you got a chance to compare both sets? Then, why did you consider about gettng ZPEB if you already owned ZEB?
I was also seriously thinking about getting IVP dictionaries (NT set) instead of ZEB. I wonder if most of IVP articles are very lengthy & very technical? Can you tell me how many pages it usually takes for one article? Do you think IVP dictionaries (NT set) can be considered as a whole set of NT commentaries? What is the difference between IVP dictionaries & NT commentaries?
By: Yip on November 28, 2009
at 6:46 pm
Yip: Not exactly. They told me that I (as someone who doesn’t have the old set but does have the new set) don’t need to bother with the old one. The general sentiment is that the new has effectively replaced the old. I have not had a chance to compare the sets but I considered getting the original because of the low price, and because it would be interesting to see how it compares. In the end, I just don’t have the money for it right now so I won’t be getting it.
I would heartily recommend the IVP “Black dictionaries” although I hear that the Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels is in the process of being revised so you might want to hold off on that one. The articles vary as is to be expected. Some are lengthy and fairly technical but nothing overwhelming. They’re worth the price of purchase for the end-of-article bibliographies alone. No, I wouldn’t consider them commentaries. They have articles on all the books of the NT, but they’re basically outlines of and introductions to the books. They don’t provide the exegesis that you’d get from a formal commentary.
By: Nick Norelli on November 28, 2009
at 8:14 pm
Nick: Honestly, I do have a concern regarding ZEB which is the editor himself. I trust Merrill Tenney who did a good job on ZPEB. Many people recommend ZPEB. Yet, ZEB is entirely revised by another editor. I don’t know much about this editior, so I cannot tell whether he can do a nice job like Merrill Tenney. I don’t know how reliable the information of both the new contributors and the new editor is. Of course, current archaeological research and colorful photos & maps are very useful. Yet, the content itself is most vital. I wonder if the original content would be more reliable/accurate than the revised version. Therefore, I am thinking whether I should keep both sets to compare.
Besides, do you know when the revised version of Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels would come out? I did call IVP one month ago, the representative mentioned that he did not know Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels was in the process of being revised. Are you sure about this?
If IVP dictionaries are basically outlines of and introductions to the books, why don’t people buy a couple of very good commentary sets which consist of outlines, introductions, and the exegesis?
Would you choose ZEB if you can only afford one set of Encyclopedia? Is it true that if you can buy either ZEB or IVP, you would buy IVP regardless of price?
By: Yip on November 29, 2009
at 1:58 am
Yip: Moisés Silva is a top notch evangelical scholar. Zondervan would be hard-pressed to find someone better. He earned his PhD at the University of Manchester where he studied under F. F. Bruce. He has taught at some very good institutions (Westmont College; Westminster Theological Seminar; Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) and he’s published a number of books on a variety of subjects and they’re all of the highest quality. He’s also a past president of the Evangelical Theological Society. A good friend of mine, Esteban Vázquez, lovingly refers to him as “The Infallible Moisés Silva” or “Our Infallible Hero” because of the quality of his scholarship. I can’t speak for the original set but I can say that the general reliability of the present set is not in question. There will always be things to quibble over and disagree with but that’s true of any work. If keeping both sets won’t place an undue burden on your finances then I say go for it and compare. I’m sure you’d find it a useful exercise and if you were inclined to do so, you could note significant differences and perhaps make them available for others to see on the internet.
I do not know when the revised Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels will come out. So far I’ve only heard rumors that a revision is in the works. The buzz has been that Scot McKnight who is one of the editors of the first edition has been telling students and friends that a revision is in the works. Past that I have no information.
The IVP dictionaries are much more than outlines and introductions. I was just pointing out that they contained outlines and introductions of every book in the NT. They also contain thousands of articles on a variety of subjects pertaining to each corpus of books they cover. And I would imagine that people do buy good commentaries in addition to these dictionaries. They really serve different purposes so it’s wise to have both.
If I had to choose between the IVP dictionaries and the ZEB then I’d choose the IVP dictionaries because they take a more historical-critical approach to Biblical interpretation and they contain more articles from scholars that I have personally benefited from than the ZEB. The ZEB is a great resource in its own right and I’m glad to own both, but like I said, if I had to choose then the IVP dictionaries would be my choice.
By: Nick Norelli on November 29, 2009
at 2:41 am
I contacted Scot McKnight in ‘08 and he said that the revision is “at least three years away.”
By: adhunt on November 29, 2009
at 11:47 am
Tony: There you go. So hopefully in a little more than a year we’ll see it.
By: Nick Norelli on November 29, 2009
at 6:13 pm
Nick: The IVP Bible Dictionary Series consist of 3 OT & 4 NT. It seems to me that both the Dictionary of Paul and His Letters & the Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels are the popular ones. Which two dictionaries would you recommend me to buy if I can only afford buying two out of seven dictionaries? Can you please prioritize all seven dictionaries for me?
Which set of bible dictionaries would you buy if you can only buy one set? Would you still buy the IVP Bible Dictionary Series?
By: Yip on November 30, 2009
at 1:54 am
Yip: I own 5 of the 7 IVP dictionaries. The ones I don’t own are Dictionary of Later New Testament and Its Developments and Dictionary of the Old Testament: Wisdom, Poetry, & Writings. Of the ones I own I would say that I’ve benefited the most from Dictionary of Paul and His Letters and Dictionary of New Testament Background but this only reflects that the emphasis in my studies is on the NT.
I can only prioritize the 5 that I own and my ranking will reflect my own personal study interests. So here goes:
1. Dictionary of Paul and His Letters
2. Dictionary of New Testament Background
3. Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels
4. Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch
5. Dictionary of the Old Testament: Historical Books
I’d have to know more about your main areas of interest before I could recommend two volumes to you. And yes, I’d still opt for the IVP dictionaries if I could only buy one set.
By: Nick Norelli on November 30, 2009
at 2:12 am
Nick: I am also interested in the NT more.
Can you tell me why you don’t purchase Dictionary of Later New Testament and Its Developments?
Why do you like Dictionary of New Testament Background more than Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels? Can you give me some examples of the issues that Dictionary of New Testament Background covers?
Thank you very much for all your help.
By: Yip on November 30, 2009
at 2:18 pm
Yip: I plan to purchase the remaining volumes, I just haven’t had an occasion to do it yet. I like DNTB better than DJG because I’ve gotten more use out of it. They’re both excellent for what they address but I’ve just had more time with DNTB than I have had with DJG, which is in part because DNTB is the first of these dictionaries that I owned. It covers the languages, literature, customs, geography, important figures, etc. of the Ancient Mediterranean and Greco-Roman world in which the NT is set. So here’s some examples of the articles on these various subjects:
Language — “Aramaic Language” (p. 86-91); “Greek of the New Testament” (p. 426-35); “Hebrew Language” (p. 459-63); “Latin Language” (p. 630-31).
Literature — “Septuagint/Greek Old Testament” (p. 1099-1106); “Apocryphal Acts and Epistles” (p. 66-9); “Apocryphal Gospels” (p. 71-8); “The Apostolic Fathers” (p. 81-5); the various types of Rabbinic Literature such as the “Midrashim” (p. 889-93); “Mishnah and Tosefta” (p. 893-7); “Talmud” (p. 897-902); “Targumim” (p. 902-9); as well as articles on various of the Dead Sea Scrolls and a “General Introduction” to the Dead Sea Scrolls (p. 252-66).
Customs — “Banquets” (p. 143-6); “Marriage” (p. 680-93); different liturgies “Qumran” (p. 648-50) & “Rabbinic” (p. 650-2); “Slavery” (p. 1124-7); “Travel and Trade” (p. 1245-50).
Geography — “Galilee” (p. 391-8); “Jerusalem” (p. 559-61); “Asia Minor” (p. 130-6); “Philippi” (p. 787-9); “Greece and Macedon” (p. 421-6).
Important Figures — “Senneca” (p. 1098-9); Philo (p. 789-93); “Pliny the Elder” (p. 807-8); “Pliny the Younger” (p. 808-12); “Plutarch” (p. 812-3); “Suetonius” (p. 1142-5).
This is just a tiny sampling of all this volume has to offer.
By: Nick Norelli on November 30, 2009
at 3:51 pm
Nick: I have decided to buy IVP dictionary series. If I can afford all 7 dictionaries, would you recommend me buying all of them? It seems to me that all of them won some awards, except Dictionary of the Old Testament: Historical Books. I wonder if it is worthy to buy this one. Do you highly recommend me buying each one of them? I wonder if each of them are written by top-notch conservative & evangelical scholars?
By: Yip on December 7, 2009
at 11:14 pm
Yip: If you can afford it then yeah, go for it. I have DOTHB and it’s good. As far as the contributors you can see a list for some of the volumes here.
By: Nick Norelli on December 7, 2009
at 11:32 pm
Nick: I saw the list of the contributors; yet, I am not familar with them. Do you know if they are top-notch scholars? Are they conservative & evangelical? Also, do you think all 7 of them are all excellent and highly recommended? Do you think DOTHB is weaker relatively?
By: Yip on December 8, 2009
at 1:14 am
Yip: I’ve told you a number of times that I’d recommend all of the volumes that I own. Nothing has changed. I’m confident that the two I don’t own are just as useful. DOTHB is not weaker in my opinion. It’s just as valuable for studying the historical books as DOTP is for studying the Pentateuch. All of the volumes have a good mix of scholars, some of whom are conservative and evangelical. I’m not familiar with every scholar who has contributed but you can go to the websites of the schools they teach at and learn more about them if you’re so inclined. I hope that answers your question. In the end you’re going to have to take a leap of faith and buy the dictionaries to find out for yourself, or, just skip them altogether and never know.
By: Nick Norelli on December 8, 2009
at 1:39 am