Which Translation of Calvin’s Institutes?

Which translation of Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion would you (I’m talking to those who are familiar with both translations) recommend?  The 2 volume set with Battles’ translation looks good but it’s more money than the one volume Hendrickson edition that uses the older Beveridge translation.  Out of the two which would be the one to get?  Or is there another that’s better than them both?

B”H

This entry was posted in Books (Misc.). Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Which Translation of Calvin’s Institutes?

  1. Battles. Case closed.

  2. Nathan Stitt says:

    Say it like you mean it Esteban. 8)

  3. Nick Norelli says:

    Esteban: Good enough for me! Now the question becomes: Do I purchase a copy or request one for review?

  4. Drew Tatusko says:

    mcneill, battles is it. although beveridge is free here: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.titlepage.html

  5. Mike Aubrey says:

    Battle. Battles. Battles.

    Either that or learn French & Latin.

    Hands down.

  6. Nick Norelli says:

    Drew: I have Beveridge’s translation as an e-Sword module as well, but I can only sit in front of the computer and read for so long. So I figure with next year being so idolatrously dedicated to Calvin I’d pick up a hard copy of the Institutes.

    Mike: I really need to learn both French and Latin! I took latin in the 7th grade and did incredibly well, but then I forsook it for Spanish in 8th grade, only to never learn either language well. :(

  7. I, uh, bought the H-… He-… the Hendrickson…

  8. Seumas says:

    Battles is the answer.

    Every now and again I contemplate producing a fresh translation from the Latin. But not today.

  9. tc robinson says:

    I had the two volumes set with the notation by McNeile, but I sold it.

    I’m back in the market, as it were…

  10. Nick Norelli says:

    Michael: There’s little doubt that the price is right on that volume.

    Seumas: Would that I could. My knowledge of Latin is limited to the names of logical fallacies.

    TC: Pity. I’ve never sold a book but I threw a few out that I wish I had kept.

  11. Ranger says:

    So I’m really late to the game, but I agree that McNeill (Battles) is the only way to go. Are you thinking about doing the Reformation21 read through Calvin in 2009 thing? I’m probably going to re-read through it using their reading plan.

    I’m thinking about taking a year to focus on theology, and back off NT for a year…but I don’t know if I can live up to that goal.

  12. Nick Norelli says:

    Ranger: No, no plans on reading through the Institutes in a year, but Derek Thomas’ post from earlier today in which he linked to both translations (which btw were really expensive, not a ‘good price’ like he said) got me wondering which translation was best. I’d like to have a good copy of Calvin laying around for when I need to look something up.

    My goal for next year is to spend the whole year reading/learning about the canon of Scripture. I have a number of books and articles to work through.

  13. Brian says:

    I suppose it’s a must have if one is a professional scholar but I can’t see myself forking over 50 bucks for it…. but then if I was a professional scholar I’d just use the library at whatever shcool I was teaching at….

  14. Brian says:

    FF. Bruce has a book on the Canon of Scripture to consider.

  15. Nick Norelli says:

    Brian: I wouldn’t call it a must have, but it’s definitely of interest. I’d pay $50 for the set if I had to but I can probably get a better deal than that.

    And I have the Bruce book, thanks.

  16. Mike Aubrey says:

    Nick, keep an eye of ebay for a used copy. I picked up the two volumes for $30 a while back.

  17. My copy of this wondrous edition of the Institutes was irreparably damaged in storage, and I, with much pain and anguish, had to dispose of it. Neither pain nor anguish have yet subsided.

    Nathan> I find it best to communicate my opinions humbly and unassumingly. ;-)

  18. Nick Norelli says:

    Mike: Thanks, I will. I’m contemplating a review copy but truth be told, I have no intentions of reading the whole thing, at least any time soon, so I don’t know if that would be the best bet.

  19. Pingback: Christian Books | Scripture Zealot

  20. GB says:

    Compare the the two. The bottom line is which translation do “you” like best. The important thing is getting it read.

  21. Nick Norelli says:

    GB: Yeah, but I don’t want to waste time with an inferior translation. I did end up getting Battles’ translation though.

  22. Kent says:

    Logos Bible Software is offering a collection of the Norton, Allen, and Beveridge translations of the Institutes, which you’ll be able to read side-by-side. This collection also includes the 1559 Latin edition of the Institutes and the 1560 French edition—for a total of five editions in three languages. You can learn more at http://www.calvin500.com.

  23. Nick Norelli says:

    Kent: Thanks for the head’s up. I wonder if it will get enough pre-pub interest to be produced before Calvin’s birthday this year. I doubt it but I suppose that anything is possible.

  24. C.P. Klinger says:

    One of my profs at Calvin College always recommended Beveridge’s over Battle’s. He compared Battle’s translation to the N.I.V.

  25. Mike Aubrey says:

    Klinger what did he say Beveridge was? The KJV?

  26. Pingback: An Homage to the Institutes « Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth

  27. Scott says:

    I find Battles too verbose and diluted in impact
    Allen & Beverige seem superior in terms of impact.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s